An Update from 1834
The article discusses a letter from the government to the Military Commander and Director of Colonizations of the Northern Frontier, emphasizing the importance of colonizing the territory to prevent Russian establishments at Bodega and Ross. The government instructs the commander to solicit families from all over the Republic to settle in the frontier, offering land grants and ensuring the safety and welfare of the territory. The government trusts the commander to carry out this task efficiently and is willing to cover the necessary expenses.
The original article, dated June 24, 1835, and signed by José Figueroa, captures a pivotal moment in the early settler dynamics of Alta California, particularly when considering the geopolitical challenges posed by neighboring territories and the internal colonization policies of the Mexican government. Its subject matter pertains to the urgent need for establishing a strong Mexican presence in the northern frontier of California, particularly around the bay of San Francisco and the rivers of Sacramento, to counteract foreign influences and potential threats from Russian settlements.
The message, directed to D. Mariano G. Vallejo, the Military Commander and Director of Colonizations, emphasizes the crucial geo-strategic significance of Bodega and Cape Mendocino, stating, “...the importance of the port of Bodega, and Cape Mendocino, which points are too necessary for the preservation of the national welfare.” This emphasis underscores the Mexican government's awareness of the regional competition, particularly from Russian colonies in Bodega and Ross, which were seen as direct threats to Mexican sovereignty in the aftermath of the Mexican-American War of Independence.
Figueroa's note highlights the Mexican government’s strategy of enhancing the local population density to ensure a stable Mexican presence. He explicitly urges that “the Mexican population be always greater than that of the foreign,” which illustrates a colonial strategy focused not only on land acquisition but also on demographic stability, recognizing the potential for foreign interests to disrupt Mexican governance.
Furthermore, the letter requests secrecy concerning its contents: “The government omits recommending the secrecy that this note requires, which you will not make known only in the last extremity.” This stipulation hints at the political sensitivity surrounding the colonization initiatives, suggesting that the existence of such plans was contentious and that openness could lead to complications or opposition, both domestically and internationally.
Additionally, the text echoes broader concerns about the implications of foreign intrusion and the need for a collective identity among settlers. Figueroa appeals to Vallejo’s patriotism and “good faith,” likely referencing not only Vallejo’s personal credentials but also appealing to a burgeoning sense of national sentiment among Mexican Californians. He states, “...an object so sacred, in which are concerned, the general good and the peculiar welfare of the territory in which you were born.” This appeal to personal stakes in the welfare of the territory reflects the rising consciousness of a Californio identity at a time when the dynamics of Mexican sovereignty were increasingly precarious.
In summary, the article presents a nuanced perspective on the convergence of national policy, local identity, and external threat at a critical historical juncture. Figueroa's communication sheds light on the Mexican attempts to strengthen their foothold in the increasingly contested space of northern California and the balancing act of encouraging internal colonization while maneuvering against the encroachment of foreign interests. The text not only documents administrative actions but also captures the atmosphere of a period marked by uncertainty and aspiration in the face of modern empire dynamics.
The early Californian newspapers, such as *The Californian*, often painted vivid narratives that centered around colonial endeavors, territorial defense, and the socio-political complexities of the time. A captivating glimpse into this era is captured in a letter dated June 24, 1835, from José Figueroa to D. Mariano G. Vallejo. This correspondence not only underscores the urgency of asserting territorial claims amidst foreign encroachment but also intricately interweaves themes of ambition, cultural identity, and the pursuit of legacy during California's formative years.
At the heart of Figueroa's letter lies a keen awareness of the geographical hurdles that settlers faced as they ventured into the northern regions of the San Francisco Bay and Sacramento River. He emphasizes that the "topographical situation of the frontier" presents considerable challenges to colonization efforts. In 1835, California was on the cusp of American settlement, its diverse landscape—marked by valleys, hills, and coastlines—offering both rich resources and daunting obstacles. For potential settlers, the allure of California balanced precariously with a palpable trepidation.
This reflection on geographical considerations not only shapes our understanding of California's past but also resonates with contemporary perspectives. The region's complex ecosystems have influenced modern settlement patterns, characterized by urban centers nestled amid mountains and oceans, cultivated landscapes, and expansive natural preserves. These influences echo the legacy of early colonial policies that set the stage for California’s ongoing evolution.
Figueroa's correspondence reveals a nuanced anxiety regarding incoming foreign settlers—particularly from the north. He advocates for the Mexican population in northern California to outnumber these foreign influences, a recommendation rooted in more than mere demographics. Rather, it reflects a deep-seated concern for preserving sovereignty and national identity in a region increasingly vulnerable to external pressures.
His assertion that "...the Mexican population be always greater than that of the foreign" signifies a strategic effort to maintain the local culture and governance in the face of foreign encroachments. This tension mirrors historical patterns seen in various regions worldwide, where colonization often diluted indigenous ownership and led to cultural turmoil. Figueroa’s insights reveal early perceptions of race, nationality, and settlement dynamics—concepts that would later prove pivotal during the transformative period following the Mexican-American War in the mid-19th century.
Among the more intriguing elements of Figueroa's letter is his appeal to Vallejo's ambition, suggesting that their efforts in colonizing this hallowed frontier could lead to “posthumous fame.” This notion speaks to a profound human desire for recognition and significance, motivating individuals throughout history to engage in daunting undertakings.
By intertwining the pursuit of personal advancement with a collective national honor, Figueroa effectively calls upon Vallejo to realize the connectedness of their individual contributions with the broader tapestry of national pride. Echoing through time, this sentiment is mirrored in our contemporary society, where individuals and communities strive to create impactful legacies in arenas such as sustainability, justice, and cultural preservation.
Figueroa also underscores the importance of discretion regarding the contents of his correspondence. He advocates for certain governmental strategies to remain undisclosed until absolutely necessary, reflecting the political sensitivities of the era. During a time when news could easily alter public sentiment or inflame existing tensions, this call for secrecy underscores the complexities of territorial expansion.
Historically, secrecy often served as a double-edged sword, providing protection while fostering environments of distrust among those in power. Today, contemporary sociopolitical dynamics continue to grapple with the balance between transparency and national security, drawing valuable lessons from historical precedents like Figueroa's correspondence.
A pressing theme within Figueroa's letter is the urgent need to curtail Russian encroachments at Bodega and Ross. His mention of the “progress of the Russian establishments” evokes a sense of geopolitical vigilance, encapsulating a decisive moment in California's colonial history. As Russian fur traders sought to extend their influence in North America, the Mexican government was compelled to assert its control over economically promising territories.
The proactive stance advocated by Figueroa demonstrates a clear awareness of the intentions driving both American and European empires during a period of intense competition. This historical context resonates with today’s notions of globalism and economic interdependence, as regions worldwide navigate the enduring legacies of colonial ambitions and their implications for contemporary sociopolitical landscapes.
Empowering Vallejo, Figueroa designates him as the principal official charged with colonizing California’s northern frontier. Despite the logistical challenges posed by the distance from the power of Mexico City, Figueroa expresses trust in Vallejo’s capacity to attract settlers to these uncharted lands. He implies a vision of merit-based land ownership—bestowing land titles upon deserving individuals—contrasting sharply with the brute force often associated with colonial endeavors.
This meritocratic vision would pave the way for future concepts of entitlement and property ownership, setting the stage for the intricate land disputes that characterize California today—a diverse state marked by its rich multicultural history.
José Figueroa's correspondence unveils a tapestry of narratives that defined California during its tumultuous colonial period in the 19th century. It encapsulates a mixture of topographical challenges, demographic concerns, national identity, secrecy in governance, and the enduring pursuit of legacy. These early colonial discourses resonate within our contemporary sociopolitical landscape, inviting us to critically examine the legacies we inherit and their influence on our current interactions, policies, and identities.
As we reflect on the lessons imbued within our history, we are reminded to scrutinize our collective narratives—not just to learn from the missteps of our forebears, but also to embrace the commitments required to forge a more equitable and inclusive future. Figueroa’s invocation of “God and Liberty” resonates powerfully as we navigate the complexities of diverse identities and the spaces we call home. In pursuit of a deeper understanding of our shared legacies, we must remain vigilant, recognizing the aspirations—and anxieties—of those who came before us as critical to shaping the world we inhabit today.
1. **Colonial Ambitions in 19th Century California** - This phrase invites research into colonialism in California and how it shaped current socio-political dynamics. For further reading, see the article on [California's Colonial History](https://www.history.com/topics/westward-expansion/california-gold-rush).
2. **Topographical Challenges of the Frontier** - Researching geographical obstacles faced by early settlers may provide insights into settlement patterns. For more information, check out the article on [California Geography and its Challenges](https://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/c1197/).
3. **Mexican vs. Foreign Populations** - The interactions between different populations during colonization is an important area of study. Read more about this in the article on [Cultural Interactions in Colonial California](https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/us-history/expansionism/early-california/a/the-culture-of-19th-century-california).
4. **Legacies of Colonial Policies** - Understanding how historical policies impact modern society can be seen in the context of land ownership and rights. Explore the implications in the article on [Colonial Policy and Land Rights](https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1067&context=lawfacpub).
5. **Secrecy and National Interest** - The role of secrecy in governance during colonization can shed light on contemporary political challenges. For more, refer to the article about [Secrecy in Politics](https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/2021_Secrecy.pdf).
6. **Russian Encroachments in California** - The dynamics of foreign powers in California’s history are important to understand in a global context. For further reading, visit the article on [Russian Colonization of North America](https://www.ourstate.com/russian-north-america/).
7. **Merit-Based Land Ownership** - This concept may be foundational to contemporary land rights discussions. For more on land ownership history, check out the article on [Land Ownership in America](https://www.americanbar.org/groups/state_local_governments/publications/slge/2020/winter/land-use-and-ownership-issues/).
8. **Pursuit of Legacy and Fame** - The human desire for legacy reflects broader social motivations throughout history. Explore this theme further in the article about [The Desire for Legacy in History](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212690817302198).
Each of these phrases highlights important themes within the historical context of California's colonization and encourages further exploration of these multifaceted issues.
https://cdnc.ucr.edu/ University of California Riverside Digital Newspaper Archive
The topographical situation of the frontier on the northern side of the bay of San Francisco and Sacramento rivers, may be somewhat difficult to colonize, but this government trusts that for the honor of the National government, and your own proper interests in the social order that you will not let escape an opportunity to deserve the premium to which all men aspire:—Posthumous Fame. Ultimately this territorial government knows and is persuaded of all that you have informed it respecting the danger to which this frontier is exposed on account of our neighbours of the north, and it recomends that the Mexican population be always greater than that of the foreign, who in virtue of the colonization should solicit lands in that precious portion of the territory trusted to you by the government, for which it again charges you only to give titles to those who may prove they merit them, bearing in mind the importance of the port of Bodega, and Cape Mendocina, which points are too necessary for the preservation of the national welfare. The government omits recomending the secrecy that this note requires, which you will not make known only in the last extremity, and it confides in that you will labour with assiduity in an object so sacred, in which are concerned, the general good and the peculiar welfare of the territory in which you were born. It is warranted by the prudence, patriotism and good faith of which you have given so many proofs, offering again to make them known to government. God and Liberty. Monterey, June 24, 1835. (Signed) JOSE FIGUEROA. To the Military Commander and Director of colonizations of the Northern Frontier, D. Mariano G. Vallejo. Comandancia General de la Alta California. Gobierno Politico de la Alta California. } Seals. En oficio seperado de esta fecha, se dac av. las instrucciones a que se deben estender sus facultades respecto de la erecelon de un pueblo en el valle de Sonoma a defecto del que se habia trazado y empezado en el de Sta. Rosa. Varios son los grandes objetos que el sup'mo. Gobno Federal se propone; pero el principal es impedir cuan pronto sea posible los progresos de las establecemeintos Rusos de Bodega y Ross, para evitar toda mira posterior sobre el territorio de la republica por el Gobno. de aquellos, la que ocasionaria graves dificultades a la nacion. Para llebar al cabo el plan indicado, y conforme a las supremas resoluciones relativas, queda V facultado para solicitar familias en todo el territorio y los demas estados de la Republica a fin de colonizar esá frontera, concediendo terrenos a todos los individuos que se quieran establecer alli, cuyas concesiones los seran confirmadas por el Gobno. territorial cuando lo soliciten los intererados, sirviendoles entretanto de garantia suficiente el titulo que obtengan de v. como unico faculiado por la superioridad para conceder terrenos en esa frontera de su cargo. El sup'mo. Gobno esta satisfactoriamente convencido de que v. es el unico oficial a quien se puede confiar tamaña empresa y para que se verifique de una manera segura, esta dispuesto a erogar los gastos necesarios para ello, encargando a v. procure una justa y prudente economia en este particular llevando cuenta ecsacta de todo, y avisando a ese Gobno. En el remoto caso de no poder el Gobierno Territorial sendir algusa veq eon los articulos necesaries para ausiliar a los colonos, encarga a v. haga suplementos por de pronto.
The message, directed to D. Mariano G. Vallejo, the Military Commander and Director of Colonizations, emphasizes the crucial geo-strategic significance of Bodega and Cape Mendocino, stating, “...the importance of the port of Bodega, and Cape Mendocino, which points are too necessary for the preservation of the national welfare.” This emphasis underscores the Mexican government's awareness of the regional competition, particularly from Russian colonies in Bodega and Ross, which were seen as direct threats to Mexican sovereignty in the aftermath of the Mexican-American War of Independence.
Figueroa's note highlights the Mexican government’s strategy of enhancing the local population density to ensure a stable Mexican presence. He explicitly urges that “the Mexican population be always greater than that of the foreign,” which illustrates a colonial strategy focused not only on land acquisition but also on demographic stability, recognizing the potential for foreign interests to disrupt Mexican governance.
Furthermore, the letter requests secrecy concerning its contents: “The government omits recommending the secrecy that this note requires, which you will not make known only in the last extremity.” This stipulation hints at the political sensitivity surrounding the colonization initiatives, suggesting that the existence of such plans was contentious and that openness could lead to complications or opposition, both domestically and internationally.
Additionally, the text echoes broader concerns about the implications of foreign intrusion and the need for a collective identity among settlers. Figueroa appeals to Vallejo’s patriotism and “good faith,” likely referencing not only Vallejo’s personal credentials but also appealing to a burgeoning sense of national sentiment among Mexican Californians. He states, “...an object so sacred, in which are concerned, the general good and the peculiar welfare of the territory in which you were born.” This appeal to personal stakes in the welfare of the territory reflects the rising consciousness of a Californio identity at a time when the dynamics of Mexican sovereignty were increasingly precarious.
In summary, the article presents a nuanced perspective on the convergence of national policy, local identity, and external threat at a critical historical juncture. Figueroa's communication sheds light on the Mexican attempts to strengthen their foothold in the increasingly contested space of northern California and the balancing act of encouraging internal colonization while maneuvering against the encroachment of foreign interests. The text not only documents administrative actions but also captures the atmosphere of a period marked by uncertainty and aspiration in the face of modern empire dynamics.
The Pursuit of Posthumous Fame: Colonial Ambitions in 19th Century California
The early Californian newspapers, such as *The Californian*, often painted vivid narratives that centered around colonial endeavors, territorial defense, and the socio-political complexities of the time. A captivating glimpse into this era is captured in a letter dated June 24, 1835, from José Figueroa to D. Mariano G. Vallejo. This correspondence not only underscores the urgency of asserting territorial claims amidst foreign encroachment but also intricately interweaves themes of ambition, cultural identity, and the pursuit of legacy during California's formative years.
Setting the Scene: Topographical Challenges of the Frontier
At the heart of Figueroa's letter lies a keen awareness of the geographical hurdles that settlers faced as they ventured into the northern regions of the San Francisco Bay and Sacramento River. He emphasizes that the "topographical situation of the frontier" presents considerable challenges to colonization efforts. In 1835, California was on the cusp of American settlement, its diverse landscape—marked by valleys, hills, and coastlines—offering both rich resources and daunting obstacles. For potential settlers, the allure of California balanced precariously with a palpable trepidation.
This reflection on geographical considerations not only shapes our understanding of California's past but also resonates with contemporary perspectives. The region's complex ecosystems have influenced modern settlement patterns, characterized by urban centers nestled amid mountains and oceans, cultivated landscapes, and expansive natural preserves. These influences echo the legacy of early colonial policies that set the stage for California’s ongoing evolution.
The Politics of Colonization: Mexican vs. Foreign Populations
Figueroa's correspondence reveals a nuanced anxiety regarding incoming foreign settlers—particularly from the north. He advocates for the Mexican population in northern California to outnumber these foreign influences, a recommendation rooted in more than mere demographics. Rather, it reflects a deep-seated concern for preserving sovereignty and national identity in a region increasingly vulnerable to external pressures.
His assertion that "...the Mexican population be always greater than that of the foreign" signifies a strategic effort to maintain the local culture and governance in the face of foreign encroachments. This tension mirrors historical patterns seen in various regions worldwide, where colonization often diluted indigenous ownership and led to cultural turmoil. Figueroa’s insights reveal early perceptions of race, nationality, and settlement dynamics—concepts that would later prove pivotal during the transformative period following the Mexican-American War in the mid-19th century.
Legacy and Posthumous Fame: A Call to National Honor
Among the more intriguing elements of Figueroa's letter is his appeal to Vallejo's ambition, suggesting that their efforts in colonizing this hallowed frontier could lead to “posthumous fame.” This notion speaks to a profound human desire for recognition and significance, motivating individuals throughout history to engage in daunting undertakings.
By intertwining the pursuit of personal advancement with a collective national honor, Figueroa effectively calls upon Vallejo to realize the connectedness of their individual contributions with the broader tapestry of national pride. Echoing through time, this sentiment is mirrored in our contemporary society, where individuals and communities strive to create impactful legacies in arenas such as sustainability, justice, and cultural preservation.
The Imperative of Secrecy and National Interest
Figueroa also underscores the importance of discretion regarding the contents of his correspondence. He advocates for certain governmental strategies to remain undisclosed until absolutely necessary, reflecting the political sensitivities of the era. During a time when news could easily alter public sentiment or inflame existing tensions, this call for secrecy underscores the complexities of territorial expansion.
Historically, secrecy often served as a double-edged sword, providing protection while fostering environments of distrust among those in power. Today, contemporary sociopolitical dynamics continue to grapple with the balance between transparency and national security, drawing valuable lessons from historical precedents like Figueroa's correspondence.
The Defense Against Foreign Interests: A Pre-Emptive Strike
A pressing theme within Figueroa's letter is the urgent need to curtail Russian encroachments at Bodega and Ross. His mention of the “progress of the Russian establishments” evokes a sense of geopolitical vigilance, encapsulating a decisive moment in California's colonial history. As Russian fur traders sought to extend their influence in North America, the Mexican government was compelled to assert its control over economically promising territories.
The proactive stance advocated by Figueroa demonstrates a clear awareness of the intentions driving both American and European empires during a period of intense competition. This historical context resonates with today’s notions of globalism and economic interdependence, as regions worldwide navigate the enduring legacies of colonial ambitions and their implications for contemporary sociopolitical landscapes.
The Call for Settlements and the Role of Governance
Empowering Vallejo, Figueroa designates him as the principal official charged with colonizing California’s northern frontier. Despite the logistical challenges posed by the distance from the power of Mexico City, Figueroa expresses trust in Vallejo’s capacity to attract settlers to these uncharted lands. He implies a vision of merit-based land ownership—bestowing land titles upon deserving individuals—contrasting sharply with the brute force often associated with colonial endeavors.
This meritocratic vision would pave the way for future concepts of entitlement and property ownership, setting the stage for the intricate land disputes that characterize California today—a diverse state marked by its rich multicultural history.
Conclusion: Resurgence of Historical Context
José Figueroa's correspondence unveils a tapestry of narratives that defined California during its tumultuous colonial period in the 19th century. It encapsulates a mixture of topographical challenges, demographic concerns, national identity, secrecy in governance, and the enduring pursuit of legacy. These early colonial discourses resonate within our contemporary sociopolitical landscape, inviting us to critically examine the legacies we inherit and their influence on our current interactions, policies, and identities.
As we reflect on the lessons imbued within our history, we are reminded to scrutinize our collective narratives—not just to learn from the missteps of our forebears, but also to embrace the commitments required to forge a more equitable and inclusive future. Figueroa’s invocation of “God and Liberty” resonates powerfully as we navigate the complexities of diverse identities and the spaces we call home. In pursuit of a deeper understanding of our shared legacies, we must remain vigilant, recognizing the aspirations—and anxieties—of those who came before us as critical to shaping the world we inhabit today.
Key Phrases:
1. **Colonial Ambitions in 19th Century California** - This phrase invites research into colonialism in California and how it shaped current socio-political dynamics. For further reading, see the article on [California's Colonial History](https://www.history.com/topics/westward-expansion/california-gold-rush).
2. **Topographical Challenges of the Frontier** - Researching geographical obstacles faced by early settlers may provide insights into settlement patterns. For more information, check out the article on [California Geography and its Challenges](https://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/c1197/).
3. **Mexican vs. Foreign Populations** - The interactions between different populations during colonization is an important area of study. Read more about this in the article on [Cultural Interactions in Colonial California](https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/us-history/expansionism/early-california/a/the-culture-of-19th-century-california).
4. **Legacies of Colonial Policies** - Understanding how historical policies impact modern society can be seen in the context of land ownership and rights. Explore the implications in the article on [Colonial Policy and Land Rights](https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1067&context=lawfacpub).
5. **Secrecy and National Interest** - The role of secrecy in governance during colonization can shed light on contemporary political challenges. For more, refer to the article about [Secrecy in Politics](https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/2021_Secrecy.pdf).
6. **Russian Encroachments in California** - The dynamics of foreign powers in California’s history are important to understand in a global context. For further reading, visit the article on [Russian Colonization of North America](https://www.ourstate.com/russian-north-america/).
7. **Merit-Based Land Ownership** - This concept may be foundational to contemporary land rights discussions. For more on land ownership history, check out the article on [Land Ownership in America](https://www.americanbar.org/groups/state_local_governments/publications/slge/2020/winter/land-use-and-ownership-issues/).
8. **Pursuit of Legacy and Fame** - The human desire for legacy reflects broader social motivations throughout history. Explore this theme further in the article about [The Desire for Legacy in History](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212690817302198).
Each of these phrases highlights important themes within the historical context of California's colonization and encourages further exploration of these multifaceted issues.
**Citation**: The Californian
- VERY PRIVATE., 1847-04-03https://cdnc.ucr.edu/ University of California Riverside Digital Newspaper Archive
Original Article:
The topographical situation of the frontier on the northern side of the bay of San Francisco and Sacramento rivers, may be somewhat difficult to colonize, but this government trusts that for the honor of the National government, and your own proper interests in the social order that you will not let escape an opportunity to deserve the premium to which all men aspire:—Posthumous Fame. Ultimately this territorial government knows and is persuaded of all that you have informed it respecting the danger to which this frontier is exposed on account of our neighbours of the north, and it recomends that the Mexican population be always greater than that of the foreign, who in virtue of the colonization should solicit lands in that precious portion of the territory trusted to you by the government, for which it again charges you only to give titles to those who may prove they merit them, bearing in mind the importance of the port of Bodega, and Cape Mendocina, which points are too necessary for the preservation of the national welfare. The government omits recomending the secrecy that this note requires, which you will not make known only in the last extremity, and it confides in that you will labour with assiduity in an object so sacred, in which are concerned, the general good and the peculiar welfare of the territory in which you were born. It is warranted by the prudence, patriotism and good faith of which you have given so many proofs, offering again to make them known to government. God and Liberty. Monterey, June 24, 1835. (Signed) JOSE FIGUEROA. To the Military Commander and Director of colonizations of the Northern Frontier, D. Mariano G. Vallejo. Comandancia General de la Alta California. Gobierno Politico de la Alta California. } Seals. En oficio seperado de esta fecha, se dac av. las instrucciones a que se deben estender sus facultades respecto de la erecelon de un pueblo en el valle de Sonoma a defecto del que se habia trazado y empezado en el de Sta. Rosa. Varios son los grandes objetos que el sup'mo. Gobno Federal se propone; pero el principal es impedir cuan pronto sea posible los progresos de las establecemeintos Rusos de Bodega y Ross, para evitar toda mira posterior sobre el territorio de la republica por el Gobno. de aquellos, la que ocasionaria graves dificultades a la nacion. Para llebar al cabo el plan indicado, y conforme a las supremas resoluciones relativas, queda V facultado para solicitar familias en todo el territorio y los demas estados de la Republica a fin de colonizar esá frontera, concediendo terrenos a todos los individuos que se quieran establecer alli, cuyas concesiones los seran confirmadas por el Gobno. territorial cuando lo soliciten los intererados, sirviendoles entretanto de garantia suficiente el titulo que obtengan de v. como unico faculiado por la superioridad para conceder terrenos en esa frontera de su cargo. El sup'mo. Gobno esta satisfactoriamente convencido de que v. es el unico oficial a quien se puede confiar tamaña empresa y para que se verifique de una manera segura, esta dispuesto a erogar los gastos necesarios para ello, encargando a v. procure una justa y prudente economia en este particular llevando cuenta ecsacta de todo, y avisando a ese Gobno. En el remoto caso de no poder el Gobierno Territorial sendir algusa veq eon los articulos necesaries para ausiliar a los colonos, encarga a v. haga suplementos por de pronto.
