The Headlines of History: News from the United States and Mexico (1846)

 

The Headlines of History

The article discusses important military developments in California, including the arrival of Colonel Kearney with 3,000 troops, the sailing of a volunteer regiment from New York, and advances by the American Army under General Taylor to Monterey. The battle resulted in heavy casualties on both sides, with a reported 1500 American soldiers killed and 6000 Mexican soldiers lost. An armistice between the two armies was agreed upon for two months.

In the article titled "NEWS FROM THE UNITED STATES AND MEXICO," we are presented with a snapshot of military movements and conflicts occurring during a crucial period of the Mexican-American War (1846-1848). This excerpt serves as a primary source document that provides insight into the military strategies, troop movements, and the intensity of engagements on the battlefield during this period.

The article highlights the preparations of U.S. forces, indicating that "Col. Kearney is on his way to California with 3,000 troops," which underscores the significance of California in the broader military strategy of the United States. The mention of Kearney’s mission emphasizes the expansionist sentiment characterized by the concept of Manifest Destiny, which partially motivated the war. California, rich in resources and strategic ports, was a focal point for American expansion.

Furthermore, the article details troop deployments from the East Coast, including "Four Transports, with a volunteer regiment of 1,000 men under Col. Stevenson," preparing to set sail for the Pacific. This logistical information signals a well-coordinated effort to bolster military presence in California, reflecting the urgency and scale of U.S. military campaigns during the war. The mention that they would be "under convoy of two sloops of war, the Preble and Yorktown," highlights the naval support crucial for safeguarding troop movements across the treacherous seas, which were a significant factor in the success of military operations.

One of the most significant portions of the article discusses the Battle of Monterrey, revealing that "Our Army under General Taylor had advanced to Monterey where they have had a very hard fight," lasting multiple days. The article elaborates on the aftermath of the confrontation, noting heavy casualties on both sides: "our loss is reported by the Mexican papers at 1500 killed; and we have had news that the Mexicans lossed six thousand." This stark depiction of the battle reinforces the brutal nature of the conflict and illustrates the high human cost associated with territorial conquests. The differentiation in casualty reports from both sides also indicates the propaganda wars that accompanied military engagements.

Finally, the article notes a significant political development: “the capitulation embraced an armistice between the two armies of two months." This temporary reprieve indicates that while military engagements were fierce, there were moments where both sides recognized the need to pause and consider larger strategic objectives and the implications of continuing hostilities.

In conclusion, this article not only informs us about the military strategies and challenges faced by the United States during the Mexican-American War but also reflects broader themes of American expansionism, military preparedness, and conflicts that characterized mid-19th century U.S.-Mexico relations. It serves as a valuable historical document, shedding light on both the operational aspects of the war and the human toll involved.

The Headlines of History: News from the United States and Mexico (1846)

The year 1846 marked a profound shift in the history of North America. It was a pivotal moment filled with both conflict and expansion, as the aspirations of a young nation collided sharply with the realities of a rapidly changing continent. An article titled “NEWS FROM THE UNITED STATES AND MEXICO,” published in *The Californian* during this tumultuous year, offers a fascinating glimpse into the military maneuvers and geopolitical strategies that would reshape what we now recognize as California and the broader Western United States.

As we immerse ourselves in this primary text, it becomes clear that the information was drawn from diverse sources, including a letter from Captain Maddox, underscoring the interconnectedness of military communication and news dissemination during this era. The article paints a vivid picture of Colonel Kearney's troop movements, the preparations of volunteer regiments, and the significant battle at Monterey. Within this historical narrative, we can trace profound implications for our contemporary society; the spirit of expansionism and conflict that characterized the 19th century resonates in today’s discussions about national identity, territorial disputes, and military power.

The Context of War: 1846

As April dawned in 1846, the United States formally declared war on Mexico, a decision fueled by various factors ranging from the annexation of Texas to the broader doctrine of Manifest Destiny—the belief that American expansion was both justified and inevitable. This conflict, now known as the Mexican-American War (1846–1848), was riddled with territorial disputes that emerged from the U.S.'s relentless march westward. Each troop movement and strategic decision from this period underlined the ambitions of a nation eager to affirm its presence on the global stage.

The article asserts that "Col. Kearney is on his way to California with 3,000 troops; he ought to be in the country now." This declaration not only reflects Kearney's military aspirations but also signifies the broader military strategy of the United States. The dispatch of a significant troop contingent to California signaled the territory's strategic importance within the war effort; after all, California was not merely another piece of land—it was the vital gateway to the Pacific Ocean, rich with resources essential for the nation’s burgeoning ambitions.

The Troop Movements: Strategic Implications

Detailing the deployment of reinforcements, the article highlights the movement of "Four Transports, with a volunteer regiment of 1,000 men under Col. Stevenson." This logistical challenge sheds light on the vast distances and intricate communication networks of the 19th century. The reliance on transports and convoy ships, like the *Preble* and the *Yorktown*, illustrates how critically important maritime routes were for reinforcements, especially considering California's geographical isolation from the eastern United States.

Furthermore, the mobilization of such a significant number of volunteer troops reflects a burgeoning sense of nationalism among the American populace. By 1846, public sentiment had largely turned in favor of the war, buoyed by the ideals of Manifest Destiny. Young men saw enlistment not just as a duty but as an opportunity for adventure, land, and honor—a sentiment that still resonates with those who serve today.

The Battle of Monterey: A Turning Point

A compelling element of the article is its focus on military engagements, especially the hard-fought victory at Monterey. The report notes, "Our Army under General Taylor had advanced to Monterey where they have had a very hard fight," highlighting the struggle’s intensity. The references to battles in September and the resulting "capitulation embraced an armistice between the two armies of two months" bring to light the harrowing human toll of war. The narrative is more than just numbers; it conveys stories of resilience and sorrow—illustrating the high costs of conflict with the staggering statistic of 1,500 American soldiers lost alongside an estimated 6,000 Mexican casualties.

The mention of losses on both sides serves to humanize the conflict. While the focus might initially seem centered on the American victory, acknowledging the substantial Mexican casualties reminds us of the brutal reality war inflicts—not just on soldiers, but on entire nations. This acknowledgment of shared suffering continues to spark dialogue concerning military intervention and the ethical considerations surrounding war.

The Armistice: A Temporary Halt

The article also references a brief armistice—the "two months" between American and Mexican forces—demonstrating the fluidity of wartime negotiations. This moment offers important lessons about the nature of conflicts and the temporary pauses that can arise amidst ongoing diplomatic discussions. Such dynamics remain relevant in present-day geopolitical landscapes, where ceasefires often hang precariously, undermined by lingering tensions.

An armistice does not necessarily imply victory or defeat; rather, it serves as a reminder of the complexities inherent in international relations—a theme that resonates in our contemporary world, whether we look at conflicts in the Middle East or Eastern Europe, where temporary agreements can quickly unravel amid deeper grievances.

Implications for Modern America

Reflecting on the events of 1846 and their coverage in *The Californian*, we uncover a legacy that continues to influence America's trajectory in the following centuries. The themes of expansionism and militarism are not merely relics of the past but resonate deeply within our current policy discussions. The ethos of Manifest Destiny has evolved into contemporary doctrines surrounding American exceptionalism, shaping both our national identity and foreign relations.

Today, issues surrounding immigration, border security, and territorial claims often draw from the historical narratives of expansion and conflict that characterized 19th-century America. As we navigate the legacies of such events, it becomes increasingly evident that history reshapes our understanding of identity, place, and belonging.

Conclusion: Lessons from the Past

The article "NEWS FROM THE UNITED STATES AND MEXICO" encapsulates a moment of historical significance—one brimming with ambition, conflict, and human stakes. The military maneuvers detailed within reflect both the aspirations of a burgeoning nation and the enduring themes that shape our society today.

Engaging with these historical narratives serves as a powerful reminder of the dichotomy between ambition and consequence. As we honor the sacrifices made by those who fought in the Mexican-American War, we simultaneously acknowledge the complex tapestry of our national identity that continues to evolve. The battles fought at Monterey are not mere historical footnotes; they form the bedrock of today’s discussions about land, identity, and ethical governance.

By examining the past, we glean insights that inform our present and guide our future. The echoes of 1846 resonate throughout our society, compelling us to contemplate the impact of a nation’s aspirations, often riddled with ethical complexities and human costs. As we move forward, we must carry these lessons with us, striving to navigate the intricate realities of modern American society with a greater awareness of our historical foundations.

Key Phrases:

1. 'Manifest Destiny' - This concept played a significant role in shaping U.S. expansionist policies. For further reading on the history and implications of Manifest Destiny, see this article from the [Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History](https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/spotlight-primary-source-manifest-destiny).

2. 'Mexican-American War (1846-1848)' - A critical conflict that altered U.S. territorial boundaries and national identity. For a comprehensive overview of this war, check out the [U.S. National Park Service](https://www.nps.gov/articles/mexican-american-war.htm).

3. 'Troop Movements and Logistics' - The complexities involved in military logistics during wartime reflect broader themes of communication and transportation. For insights into military logistics in historical contexts, refer to the [U.S. Army Logistics Management](https://www.army.mil/transportation/).

4. 'Battle of Monterey' - A pivotal battle that showcased military strategies and human costs. To explore detailed accounts of the Battle of Monterey, see this resource from [History.com](https://www.history.com/topics/mexican-american-war/battle-of-montere).

5. 'Armistice and Diplomatic Negotiations' - The dynamics of conflict resolution and temporary peace agreements have contemporary relevance. For further study on armistices and their implications, read this article from the [Council on Foreign Relations](https://www.cfr.org/timeline).

6. 'Ethical Considerations of War' - The moral implications of military interventions continue to be a subject of significant debate. To delve into the ethics of war, examine the coverage by the [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/war/).

7. 'American Exceptionalism' - This ideology has evolved from Manifest Destiny and continues to shape U.S. foreign policy. For more information on American exceptionalism, see the analysis by [The Brookings Institution](https://www.brookings.edu/research/understanding-american-exceptionalism/).

**Citation**: The Californian

- NEWS FROM THE UNITED STATES AND MEXICO., 1846-12-12
https://cdnc.ucr.edu/ University of California Riverside Digital Newspaper Archive

Original Article:

—We are indebted to the politeness of Capt. Maddox for the letter from a friend of his at San Francisco, which contains the following items of important intelligence. The news we have is that Col. Kearney is on his way to California with 3,000 troops; he ought to be in the country now. Four Transports, with a volunteer regiment of 1,000 men under Col. Stevenson, were to sail in August from New York, under convoy of two sloops of war, the Preble and Yorktown, with a small detachment of regular troops for this Port. The Independence is ready for sea at Boston, she is to be commanded by Commodore Shubrick. And the Ohio and North Carolina were fitting out, all, as the Newspapers say, destined for the Pacific. Our Army under General Taylor had advanced to Monterey where they have had a very hard fight, which lasted three days, 21st 22d and 23d of September. They took four strong batteries and the town capitulated. A very heavy loss was sustained on both sides, our loss is reported by the Mexican papers at 1500 killed; and we have had news that the Mexicans lossed six thousand, the capitulation embraced an armistice between the two armies of two months. ——————

A Look into "Late from Monterey" from The Californian

 

The article reports on the murder of 24 Mexicans at Gualopa by a party of Americans, with suspicion falling on the United States dragoons and Texas rangers. General Taylor is determined to punish those responsible. The article also describes the horrid scene of a previous massacre where wagoners were killed and mutilated by Mexican soldiers. General Urrea is reported to be at Linaries with artillery, while US troops are garrisoning nearby towns for safety.

A Look into "Late from Monterey" from The Californian

The article titled "LATE FROM MONTEREY," dated April 4 and relayed through a letter, provides a harrowing account of violent skirmishes during the Mexican-American War (1846-1848). This piece reflects not only the brutal realities and horrors of war but also the underlying tensions and interactions between American forces and local Mexican populations, as well as the implications of military responsibility during a turbulent period in U.S.-Mexican relations.

 Contextual Analysis

This report arrives at a time when the United States was deeply involved in the Mexican-American War, which stemmed from territorial disputes after the annexation of Texas. The conflict was marked by increasing hostilities and significant violence from both sides. The events detailed in the article occur amidst a backdrop of escalating tensions, particularly in the northern regions of Mexico, where American troops were attempting to assert control over territories claimed by the United States.

The specific incident mentioned, the murder of 24 Mexicans at Gualopa, underscores the fragility of the American military command. The letter states, “The murder is said to have been committed on the 28 ult.— On that night a train of loaded wagons, escorted by 200 infantry,” indicating that even with substantial military presence, violence erupted. The implication that American soldiers might be involved in such a heinous crime suggests potential accountability issues and an atmosphere of lawlessness that was often characteristic of military operations during this war.

 Direct Quotes and Their Significance

1. **“Suspicion rests upon some part of this corps, though no clue has as yet been found to discover the guilty.”** This quote reveals the immediate concern among the command structure regarding the conduct of American troops. The mention of suspicion implies a fracture in discipline and raises questions about the adherence to military ethics, a theme that would haunt many military engagements throughout American history.

2. **“General Taylor has got his steam up on the subject, and is determined to have hung every one who it can be proved, has taken part in the murder.”** General Zachary Taylor’s resolve to punish those culpable reflects not only an attempt to uphold order but also to maintain a facade of justice in the face of such brutal acts. This also demonstrates the significant challenges military leaders faced regarding troop behavior that contradicted the values the U.S. sought to project internationally.

3. **“Some had their hearts cut out and suspended upon the bushes, or thrust into their mouths. The eyes of others were dug from their sockets...”** This grotesque description serves to illustrate the extreme violence that characterized military engagements during this time. Such brutal imagery starkly contrasts with the prevailing ideals of honor and valiance often romanticized in military narratives, presenting a grim reality of war that starkly accentuates the moral implications of both the Mexican and American actions.

 Historical Interpretation

The article serves as a microcosm of the broader conflict, showcasing the human capacity for violence amid wartime chaos. The mention of “regular soldiers of the Mexican army” implies that cruelty was not limited to rogue individuals but was, in some instances, systemic and reflective of the brutal context of warfare. Additionally, the commentary about the ‘mutilation’ of bodies not only highlights the savagery associated with this particular theater of war but also speaks to the dehumanizing effects of prolonged conflict, where both sides engaged in acts designed to instill fear.

Moreover, the phrase “the scene is truly the most horrid and revolting that I have ever witnessed” positions the narrator as a witness to atrocities, which can serve as both a personal and collective critique of the war. It raises questions about the ethics of warfare and serves as a stark reminder of the costs of conflict on human life and dignity.

 Conclusion

The content of the article “LATE FROM MONTEREY” intertwines firsthand accounts of violence with broader historical themes of military conduct, accountability, and the brutal realities of the Mexican-American War. It acts as a crucial primary source for understanding the violence that accompanied the military campaigns and the clash of cultures during this contentious period in American history. Such accounts are essential for historians seeking to decode the complex narratives surrounding war and its impact on both soldiers and civilians, underlining how the consequences of such conflicts reverberate well beyond their immediate context.

 Echoes of Violence: A Look into "Late from Monterey" from The Californian

Introduction

The mid-19th century was a crucial juncture in American history, especially during the tumultuous years between 1846 and 1848 marked by the Mexican-American War. This conflict not only reshaped borders but deeply influenced the cultural fabric of North America. Within this historical context, the article "Late from Monterey" from *The Californian* offers a stark glimpse into the violent realities of warfare, societal upheaval, and the unsettling narratives that persist to this day. Through its portrayal of brutality faced by individuals during the conflict, the article serves as a powerful reminder of the human cost of war and the enduring echoes of violence that resonate across time.

 Background: The Mexican-American War

Before unearthing the specific events highlighted in the article, it’s essential to explore the broader historical context of the Mexican-American War—an episode characterized by territorial ambitions and the controversial doctrine of Manifest Destiny. This ideology, championing the idea of American expansion across North America, was both a rallying cry and a destructive force. The annexation of Texas in 1845 ignited tensions with Mexico, ultimately escalating into full-scale war. This era challenged not just military strategies but also fundamental issues of sovereignty, national identity, and human sacrifice.

As the war unfolded, the United States gained significant territories—now known as California, Arizona, New Mexico, and parts of Colorado, Nevada, and Utah—at a grievous cost to human life and ethical considerations. As we delve into the *Californian's* harrowing accounts, we witness a continuum of violence that has both immediate and long-lasting implications.

 A Gruesome Report from Monterey

The article reprints extracts from a letter dated April 4, detailing horrific events around the town of Gualopa, Mexico, where 24 Mexicans were murdered by a group of Americans. The jarring phrase “the murder is said to have been committed by a party of Americans, numbering about 20” pulls readers immediately into a grim reality that underscores the lawlessness and ethical decay that can pervade wartime.

The chilling details of execution—binding unarmed prisoners before they were shot—cast a shadow of dishonor on the American forces involved. Notably, the letter states, “General Taylor has got his steam up on the subject, and is determined to have hung every one who it can be proved, has taken part in the murder.” This excerpt indicates a palpable tension within military ranks, revealing a desperate quest for accountability amid rampant violence.

Such brutal acts starkly contrast with Taylor's call for justice, as the landscape is marred by the image of “the remains of the murdered men lay upon the plains, their flesh devoured by Mexican wolves and buzzards.” This harrowing imagery not only evokes the horror of warfare but also compels readers to confront the inhumanity that stains both sides of the conflict.

 The Complexity of Violence

The interactions between American and Mexican forces cultivated an environment in which acts of brutality became alarmingly normalized. The letter captures the inhumanity experienced by wagoners ambushed during the conflict, recounting grotesque atrocities where “some had their hearts cut out and suspended upon the bushes, or thrust into their mouths.” These horrific displays serve as a dual tactic of terror and a reflection of societal collapse, where humanity unravels under the stress of war.

The internal struggle is palpable; the perpetrators of these heinous acts were regular soldiers within the Mexican army. The article mentions, “these were committed by General Urrea's men—the regular soldiers of the Mexican army!” This blurring of moral lines highlights a conflict not only between nations but within the very fabric of humanity. Each violent act compels us to grapple with questions of honor, dignity, and the ethics surrounding warfare.

Moreover, such narratives complicate the notion of American exceptionalism that pervades discussions of Manifest Destiny. The depiction of Mexican soldiers committing brutal acts against prisoners prompts readers to reconsider the implications of their beliefs and the wars fought in their name.

The Broader Human Costs of War

The harrowing accounts in *The Californian* transcend mere stories of violence; they encapsulate the broader human costs of war. Families—both American and Mexican—grappled with loss that extended far beyond the battlefield. The devastation of lives, the disintegration of communities, and the mourning of those caught in the crossfire serve as poignant reminders of the simplistic narrative that war consists solely of victories and defeats.

The article vividly articulates despair, stating, “More than three-fourths of them, it is thought, were killed—and their bodies shockingly mutilated and disfigured.” Such details lay bare the profound disregard for human life that often pervades wartime contexts, challenging us to confront the unsettling truths that lie beneath the valorized images of war.

Today, the trauma from conflicts, like those depicted in the *Californian*, echoes in contemporary discussions about military engagement, definitions of “just” warfare, and the responsibilities toward veterans and the displaced. These narratives remind us that the scars of battle often endure long after the last shots are fired.

 The Response from Leadership

Amidst this chaos, General Taylor's response sheds light on leadership's engagement with wartime atrocities. His commitment to “have hung every one who it can be proved, has taken part in the murder” underscores an attempt to uphold honor and discipline within military ranks. However, the pursuit of accountability becomes complex in the face of overwhelming chaos, where violence often begets further violence.

This intricate dance between leadership and lawlessness illustrates a fundamental challenge in the aftermath of conflict: establishing order amidst disorder. As Taylor seeks to restore accountability, he grapples with the daunting task of differentiating guilt in a landscape torn apart by war.

Furthermore, the mention of “the Mexican wolves and buzzards” feeding on the remains serves as a powerful metaphor for the cyclical nature of violence—how it perpetuates suffering for both the aggressor and the victim. This imagery resonates with the idea that societies may remain overshadowed by their histories, with socio-political contexts continually shaping national identity through prevailing narratives.

 Reflections on Memory and Commemoration

As we reflect on the events detailed in the article, it becomes evident that memory plays a crucial role in understanding the cultural implications of war. The historical accounts in *The Californian* are not simply records; they lay the foundation for how such events are remembered or memorialized in modern society.

The neglect of the slain—leaving bodies exposed to scavengers—serves as a metaphor for how conflicts often render lives and stories invisible. Engaging with these narratives fosters empathy and reinforces the importance of recognizing the human cost of violence, urging future generations to grasp the significance of life amid the horrors of warfare.

In modern times, continual discourse around historical violence necessitates sensitivity and depth. As society constructs memorials or shares stories through various mediums, the imperative for accuracy remains paramount to preserving the humanity of those involved. Academia, art, and literature strive to wrestle with the implications of war, ensuring that the voices of the past do not fade into obscurity.

 Conclusion

The article "Late from Monterey” stands as both a haunting account of violence and a powerful artifact provoking reflections on the ramifications of war, human nature, and our collective memory. The brutal realities faced by soldiers and civilians on both sides reveal the intricate complexities inherent in warfare—showcasing facets of the human experience that extend far beyond mere historical footnotes.

As we engage with narratives born out of such fundamental conflicts, it is essential to recognize that the echoes of those events resonate throughout our present lives, shaping societal values, notions of justice, and our understanding of the sacrifices made in the name of national identity. The journey to reconcile these stories compels us to aspire for a future not defined by the repetition of history but informed by the lessons extracted from it.

Key Phrases:

1. **Mexican-American War** - This war significantly impacted territorial and cultural landscapes in North America. For further reading, see this overview of the war from [U.S. History](https://www.ushistory.org/us/29.asp).

2. **Manifest Destiny** - The ideology that justified American expansionism, often at the cost of other nations. For an analysis of this concept, check out [ThoughtCo. on Manifest Destiny](https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-manifest-destiny-104613).

3. **Human costs of war** - A consideration of the toll that violence takes on societies, beyond military losses. Explore the effects of war on civilian populations in this study from [The Lancet](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30913-3/fulltext).

4. **Wartime atrocities** - Acts of violence against civilians and unarmed individuals during conflict. For more on this subject, consult the report from [Human Rights Watch](https://www.hrw.org/publications).

5. **American exceptionalism** - The belief that the United States is inherently different from other nations, influencing its foreign policy. Read about this complex topic in the article at [Foreign Affairs](https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2018-01-02/american-exceptionalism-and-american-foreign-policy).

6. **Accountability in military leadership** - The complexities of upholding justice and order in the aftermath of conflict. For insights into military accountability, visit [The Geneva Academy](https://www.geneva-academy.ch).

7. **Scavengers in war contexts** - The symbolic and literal implications of bodies remaining exposed in war. To understand the historical context, read "Bodies in War" from [MIT Press](https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/bodies-war).

8. **Cultural memory of war** - The role of memory in shaping societal understanding of historical conflicts. For deeper exploration, see [The International Encyclopedia of Communication](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781405186414.wbiecm070).

9. **Socio-political implications of historical violence** - How past conflicts can continue to shape identity and politics. For further exploration, visit the article on historical memory from [The Guardian](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/12/history-memory).

10. **Echoes of violence** - The lasting impacts of historical violence on contemporary society. For insights, check the article from [Social Justice Journal](https://www.socialjusticejournal.org).

**Citation**: The Californian
- LATE FROM MONTEREY., 1847-10-27
https://cdnc.ucr.edu/ University of California Riverside Digital Newspaper Archive

Original Article:

The schooner Heroine arrived at New Orleans, on Thursday, from the Brazos. The Delta contains a, letter dated Monterey, April 4, from which we made the following extracts: Three days ago the alcalde and priest of a small town some twenty miles distant, on the road to China, came in in and reported to General Taylor the murder of 24 Mexicans, at Gualopa, a small rancho about six miles from Ramus. The murder was committed, they say, by a party of Americans, numbering about 20, and was done in the night. The murdered men were first made prisoners, tied, and afterwards all shot through their heads. The murder is said to have been committed on the 28 ult.— On that night a train of loaded wagons, escorted by 200 infantry, and about the same number of horse under the command of Colonel Mitchell, of the 1st Ohio regiment, encamped at Marin, which is about five miles from the scene of the murder. The mounted men were composed of the United States dragoons and Texas rangers, under the command of Captain Graham, of the 2d dragoons - Suspicion rests upon some part of this corps, though no clue has as yet been found to discover the guilty. The officers in command— gentlemen and rigid disciplinarians - are using every means in their power to investigate the matter. Gen. Taylor has got his steam up on the subject, and is determined to have hung every one who it can be proved, has taken part in the murder. The town where these men were killed is but a few miles from the place where she large train was captured and so many wagoners massacred on the 22d of February. Some 15 or 20 of the wagoners who escaped from that massacre came up in the last train, yet there is no evidence that they were engaged in the Gualopa murder. I passed over the place of the massacre of the 22d of February a few days ago, and the scene is truly the most horrid and revolting that I have ever witnessed. The remains of the murdered men, yet unburied, stripped of every particle of clothing, lay upon the plains, their flesh devoured by Mexican wolves and buzzards, and their bones bleached in tho sun. The train was a very large and valuable one, and streatched out from three to four miles in length. The attack was made upon the escort, who were in the advance, by a large body of lancers. The escort, forty men, under Lieutenant Barbour of the Kentucky Legion, were all taken prisoners, and are now in the possessin of Urrea. The lancers charged down the train, and lanced without mercy the waggoners as they ran for their lives to the chapparal. More than three-fourths of them, it is thought, were killed — and their bodies shockingly mutilated and disfigured. Those who passed the scene a few days after say that some had their hearts cut out and suspended upon the bushes, or thrust into their mouths. The eyes of others were dug from their sockets and inserted in the wounds made in other parts of their bodies ; and other mutilations were performed that would make even a North American savage blush to look at. Yet these were committed by General Urrea's men—the regular soldiers of the Mexican army ! Urrea, by last accounts, was at Linaries, expecting reinforcements. It is rumored that he has four pieces of artillery with him. Marin, Cerralvo, Mier, and China, will all be garrisoned by our troops, which will render our communication with Camargo entirely safe. The troops here are in excellent health and condition.